">

SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach

Geo-Targeted SEO for Distributors

A key strategy involves creating location-specific content that resonates with the local audience. For businesses operating in multiple locations, it becomes essential not to localize the main site but rather to create specific landing pages optimized for each location. Analyzing the Effectiveness of Your Current SEOR Strategy as a WholesalerLocal SEO Audit InsightsWhen evaluating your current SEO strategy as a wholesaler, the first step is conducting a thorough Local SEO audit. This means incorporating region-specific keywords naturally within your site's content-from product descriptions to metadata like title tags and headers. If correctly implemented, localization strengthens the visibility of your website in local searches without needing to overly generalize content for all locations. Effective optimization involves regular updates like posts regarding promotions or company news which keep potential customers informed and engaged directly through GMB. Creating Compelling Local ContentContent that resonates with a local audience can significantly boost your SEO efforts. read about the best SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach For instance, if operating a distribution business within a particular region, providing detailed guides related to logistics or regional supply chain issues could position you as a go-to resource locally. Scheduled updates through blog posts about local events or guides on regional amenities can anchor your site's authority in a locality.

Additionally, regular updates through blog posts about community events or news can keep the content fresh and more engaging for locals. Each piece of content should be crafted to support not just SEO goals but also provide real value to local residents, thereby enhancing engagement and improving search rankings. Local Content CreationDeveloping relevant, locally-focused content is essential for connecting with regional audiences. WEBSITE LOCALISATIONEffective localization of your website plays a pivotal role in ensuring relevance in local search results. Links from reputable and relevant sites carry more weight and contribute positively to your SEO efforts. Highlighting testimonials on key pages or incorporating user-generated content can enrich site content relevancy-another factor appreciated by search engines when ranking sites for local queries. This comprehensive health check serves not only as due diligence but also identifies areas for improvement and opportunities for growth in local search visibility. For wholesalers looking to increase visibility in specific geographic areas, building a robust profile of accurate and consistent local citations is crucial.

Localizing Your Website ContentFor a wholesale distributor, ensuring that your website is localized is fundamental. By using schema markup (a form of structured data), businesses can help search engines better understand specific details about their company, such as products offered, services provided, business hours, and geographical locations. By understanding your current standing and the competitive landscape, you can pinpoint areas for improvement and opportunities to outshine competitors.

SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach - SEO for Cross-Channel Marketing

  1. Industry-Specific SEO Consulting
  2. On-Page SEO for Distributors
Accurate and comprehensive information on your GMB profile not only boosts your visibility but also increases the likelihood of consumer engagement and conversion. Website Localization TechniquesA crucial aspect of your SEO strategy involves website localization. Accurate and complete profiles supplemented with regular posts about offers or operations can transform how local prospects perceive your brand. Monitoring Performance and Adjusting StrategiesOngoing monitoring of how a Local SEO strategy performs is vital for sustained success in competitive markets. Scheduled updates or batch content creation tailored around local interests-such as community events or regional landmarks-can significantly enhance a webpage's attractiveness and relevance to a local audience.

Content hubs centered around specific locations help aggregate relevant information which not only serves user intent but also boosts local search rankings through increased engagement and relevance. DEVELOPING LOCAL CONTENTCreating content specifically designed to engage a local audience can significantly enhance your SEO efforts. This research not only informs content creation but also shapes the optimization strategies for both on-page elements like metadata and off-site features such as Google My Business (GMB) profiles. This process involves listing your business on reputable directories, local business associations' websites, and industry-related portals. " rather than just searching "bulk office supplies" can help in crafting content that answers these queries effectively. Regularly updating blogs with articles about local events or news, crafting guides pertinent to the locality such as real estate moves or community activities establishes a connection with potential customers while enhancing SEO efforts. Moreover, these keywords can effectively address the personalization and localization preferences inherent in modern search engine algorithms. This responsiveness directly influences local search rankings where immediate access and convenience are prioritized by potential customers.

Wholesale Directory Submissions for SEO

SEO strategy consultant for wholesale suppliers

Why User Experience Matters in SEO for Wholesale Distributors

Implementing this requires adjustments to the HTML of your website pages where you embed the specific tags needed for these schemas directly into your site's code or through tools that automate some steps like Google's Structured Data Markup Helper.

SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach - Industry-Specific SEO Consulting

  1. Geo-Targeted SEO for Distributors
  2. Competitor SEO Analysis
  3. SEO Analytics for Wholesale
This audit includes checking your local search rankings, reviewing your reputation management strategies, and analyzing your inbound local links among other factors. Strategic AdvantagesIncorporating long-tail keywords into your SEO strategy can significantly enhance your visibility and attract highly targeted traffic to your site. Proper localization will help establish your site's prominence within local searches pertinent to each operational area. By utilizing advanced tools for local keyword research, businesses can pinpoint precisely how to optimize their site's localization and which keywords to target. Moreover, ensuring that contact pages and footers have localized information can significantly boost local search engine result page (SERP) placements.

Reputation Management & Google ReviewsMaintaining a positive online reputation through proactive review management can dramatically affect customer perceptions and decision-making processes. OPTIMIZING GOOGLE MY BUSINESS AND MANAGING ONLINE REPUTATIONSetting up an optimized Google My Business profile is essential due to its direct influence on local search visibility including map packs and Local Finder results. Manage Online Reputation and ReviewsProactively manage customer reviews on platforms like Google to enhance reputation management effectively. Crafting Local ContentTo genuinely resonate with a local audience, producing relevant and engaging content is key. For instance, if operating as a wholesaler in different regions, consider developing targeted content hubs for each location page on your website discussing neighborhood-specific topics which aid in enhancing local visibility and engagement.

Leveraging Google My Business PostsRegular posting via your GMB account serves as an effective channel for immediate communication with your audience about promotions or updates while enhancing your business's digital footprint in localized searches. Keywords should reflect your product offerings while aligning with local search trends. Strategies to Outrank Competitors in Local Search ResultsLocal SEO Audit ImportanceA thorough local SEO audit forms the backbone of any successful local visibility strategy. This tool puts your business information at the forefront in Google Maps and local search results, increasing likelihoods of consumer engagement directly from their search activities. This process involves analyzing search trends and adapting strategies to meet evolving consumer behaviors, ensuring sustained growth in search rankings by continually updating keywords as market dynamics shift.

Essentials of Voice Search Optimization For Wholesale BusinessesUnderstanding Voice Search Optimization for Wholesale BusinessesVoice search optimization is critical for wholesale businesses aiming to improve their local SEO performance. A site that adjusts smoothly to fit different screen sizes improves usability and satisfies mobile users, which is a significant ranking factor for search engines post-Mobilegeddon. This detail informs search engines about the geographical relevance of your website, enhancing its visibility in local searches. Such strategic localization enhances user experience and search engine visibility by aligning your online presence with geographic relevance. This method not only enriches the user experience but also helps increase engagement metrics on GMB profiles-factors that influence local ranking positions prominently within Google Maps and Local Pack listings.

SEO specialist for wholesale companies

By focusing on detailed, varied keyword phrases that directly speak to the consumer's intent and regional needs, businesses can dominate lesser-exploited niches within the local search landscape. GMB Profile Setup and OptimizationOptimizing your Google My Business (GMB) profile is pivotal for increasing local visibility online. Comprehensive keyword research that considers buyer intent and competition levels helps pinpoint exactly how to optimize your website's local relevance.

Fast-loading pages reduce bounce rates and increase user satisfaction, which Google rewards with higher page rankings. For distributors aiming to establish dominance in specific locales or regions, actively managing these reviews becomes crucial.

SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach - On-Page SEO for Distributors

  • Local Business Schema Markup
  • SEO Conversion Rate Optimization
  • Business Profile Optimization


Conducting Thorough Local Keyword ResearchIdentifying what potential customers are searching locally forms the backbone of any successful local SEO campaign. This process includes analyzing search volume linked to specific local keywords and understanding patterns that reflect user intent and behavior.

Fostering Positive Online Reputations Through ReviewsOnline reviews are increasingly decisive for consumers choosing between businesses on platforms like Google Maps or Search Local Packs. SEO for Cross-Channel Marketing For multi-location businesses, creating optimized individual landing pages for each area ensures that every branch gains visibility without diluting the main site's relevance to broader searches.

SEO consultant for B2B wholesale companies

Impact on Consumer Decision-MakingCustomer reviews frequently play a pivotal role in shaping purchasing decisions. Backlinks are essentially links from other websites that lead back to your own site. Best Practices in Backlink AcquisitionWhen acquiring backlinks, focus on quality over quantity. This research informs content creation, ensuring that all published material-whether on your website or Google Business Profile-is optimized for maximum impact in local search results.

For local SEO, particularly for wholesale distributors looking to improve their online visibility, implementing structured data is crucial. Such tailored content enhances relevance in local search results-ensuring that each branch or outlet gains optimum visibility. WEBSITE LOCALISATIONFor wholesale distributors operating in specific locales or multiple regions, website localization is crucial.

For wholesale distributors, schemas such as "LocalBusiness", "Product", and "Organization" are typically beneficial. Reputation Management Through ReviewsActively managing online reviews is essential since they significantly influence prospective clients' perceptions and decisions. By enhancing local visibility, building trustworthiness, influencing purchasing decisions, integrating with broader marketing activities, fostering customer loyalty, and ultimately driving sales growth-effective management of online consumer feedback creates a comprehensive path toward sustained competitive advantage in the digital marketplace. Customer Review Optimization

From accurate contact details to engaging posts about offers or events, every piece of information contributes to increased customer engagement and perceptions of credibility-factors that directly influence buying decisions. This process involves analyzing search terms that integrate locality with consumer needs, ensuring that you target keywords effectively within your content and meta tags. In effect this means that by implementing strategic blogging tactics focused on localization-from audits through content creation-you can drive more targeted traffic to your distribution site while improving overall online presence within specific communities.23.

On-Page SEO for Distributors

Hire an SEO expert for wholesale companies

Conducting In-depth Local Keyword ResearchEffective local keyword research underpins successful SEO strategies by identifying what potential customers are searching for locally. This data will help you understand which types of links are most effective so you can refine your approach over time. This includes using relevant keywords in your video titles, descriptions, and tags that align with what local customers are searching for. Schedule regular updates or create batches of content that highlight local events, news, or landmarks relevant to your business sector. Keeping pace with how keywords evolve due to shifts in consumer behavior or algorithm updates is crucial for maintaining and improving search engine visibility. Effective citation management combines placement on relevant directories with strategic outreach for link building across recognized platforms like .gov sites or notable community blogs. Participating in community events or sponsorships can also lead to both direct links from event pages and coverage by local media outlets. Strategic Website LocalizationFor a distribution business, particularly those with multiple locations, website localization involves more than simply mentioning an area or city name across web pages. GOOGLE MY BUSINESS POSTSRegular updates via Google My Business posts keep your audience informed about the latest happenings at your company-from special promotions to new service announcements.

Regularly posting updates, promotions, and news through GMB posts can keep your audience engaged while reinforcing your presence in local searches. Regular updates to keyword strategies are necessary due to the ever-evolving nature of search algorithms and user preferences. It involves encouraging satisfied customers to share their positive experiences online while addressing any negative feedback constructively-to maintain an overall positive brand perception across review platforms. This includes integrating regional names naturally within site content and metadata. It's important that your GMB contains accurate and updated information since this is often the first interaction a potential customer will have with your business. This audit involves assessing local search rankings, reviewing citation overviews, and examining reputation management strategies. Instead of generalizing content across all regions, it's beneficial to create specific landing pages tailored to each area. This step not only helps in customizing website content to meet user intent but also assists in optimizing Google My Business (GMB) profiles accordingly.

Importance of a Comprehensive Local SEO AuditA thorough Local SEO audit is crucial for identifying the current standing of your wholesale business in search rankings and understanding the competitive landscape. Optimizing Videos for Local SearchTo fully leverage video marketing for local SEO, it's crucial to focus on optimization strategies specific to video content. Regular updates and adaptations to this keyword strategy are necessary due to constantly evolving search behaviors and algorithm updates. By reviewing elements like local search rankings, citations, and your Google Business Profile, businesses gain insight into their visibility in local searches. Enhancing Visibility Through Rich SnippetsOnce structured data is implemented correctly on a website, it paves the way for rich snippets which enhance how your listings appear in SERPs. The Role of Responsive DesignWith the increasing prevalence of mobile device usage, having a responsive website design is no longer optional for wholesale distributors. This audit examines your rankings, evaluates your citations, reviews reputation management strategies, and checks inbound links. How Long-Tail Keywords Can Benefit Wholesalers in Niche MarketsUnderstanding Long-Tail Keywords in Niche MarketsFor wholesalers operating within niche markets, the utilization of long-tail keywords is a pivotal aspect of an effective local SEO strategy.

For wholesalers in niche markets, this approach makes it possible to cut through the noise of broader searches and speak directly to those interested in what you have to offer. Website LocalisationEffective localization of your distribution site plays a crucial role in aligning with local SEO strategies. Integration with Google My BusinessIntegrating video content with your Google My Business (GMB) profile is another strategic move that can boost local search visibility. Optimizing Your Google Business ProfileA well-optimized Google Business Profile (GMB) sets the foundation for successful local SEO by enhancing your visibility in Google Maps and local pack listings. For businesses operating in multiple locations, creating distinct localized pages for each area can significantly boost relevance in regional search results, enhancing overall visibility. A Beginner's Guide to SEO for Wholesale DistributorsUnderstanding Local SEO for Wholesale DistributorsLocal SEO has become crucial for wholesale distributors looking to capture the attention of local customers. Content Creation with a Local FocusDeveloping localized content is vital for connecting with community-specific interests and needs. To put it short, implementing these essential on-page SEO techniques will ensure that distribution websites not only attract but also effectively engage their targeted local audiences efficiently.

21.Analyzing the Effectiveness of Your Current SEOR Strategy as a Wholesaler

How to Conduct a Local SEO Audit for Your Distribution BusinessLOCAL SEO AUDIT OVERVIEWConducting a local SEO audit is essential for any distribution business looking to improve its online visibility. This process involves integrating the name of cities or regions naturally across your site's content and metadata to signal relevance to localized search results. In effect this means enhancing every aspect of how your wholesale business appears online-from website localization to managing online reviews-must be aligned with best practices for voice search optimization if you aim to capture this growing segment of the market.24. Our suite of tools allows us to conduct thorough keyword research tailored to the nuances of local searches.

By reviewing these areas, you gain insights into how your business performs in local searches and identify critical opportunities for improvement. SEO Strategy Development The Power of Google My Business for Wholesale DistributorsOptimizing Your Google My Business ProfileGoogle My Business (GMB) serves as a critical tool for wholesale distributors aiming to enhance their local SEO. Frequent postings about offers or company updates through Google Posts can also engage potential customers directly from the search page.

For instance, knowing that customers might ask "Where can I find bulk office supplies near me? Examining your Google Business Profile(s) is crucial since it directly affects how you appear in local searches and Google Maps. Building Local Links and CitationsFor wholesale distributors, establishing strong connections within the community is essential.

Since voice searches are typically longer and more specific compared to text-based searches, understanding the nuances of local speech patterns can give you an edge. Better UX leads to increased engagement, lower bounce rates, and more effective conversion paths-all critical factors in boosting SEO performance. Website LocalizationFor businesses targeting specific regional markets, website localization is critical.

Affordable SEO consultant for wholesale distributors

GMB Profile OptimizationA well-optimized Google Business Profile enhances how your business appears in local searches, Google Maps, and Local Pack listings. Tools used in this phase help refine the strategic approach to include terms most likely to attract traffic from intended demographics, ensuring that marketing efforts are focused correctly. Utilizing Social Media PlatformsSocial media isn't typically directly linked to SEO rankings but leveraging these platforms can indirectly benefit your backlinking strategy. GMB Optimization StrategiesFinally, optimizing your Google Business Profile (GMB) plays an integral role in any successful local SEO strategy for wholesalers. Competitor SEO Analysis

Statistics indicate that complete Google Business Profiles are viewed as more reputable by consumers, significantly increasing both purchase intent and physical visits to your location. Tips on Managing Online Directories and Listings as a WholesalerOptimize Your Website LocalizationWhen managing online directories and listings, wholesalers must prioritize website localization. SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach This can be mirrored online through building citations and securing links from prominent local websites such as chambers of commerce or industry-specific directories.

Monitoring Performance and Making AdjustmentsIn effect this means that after implementing structured data as part of local SEO efforts for wholesale distributors or any other local business entity must monitor how these changes impact their online visibility and overall search rankings regularly.

SEO for Wholesale Buyer Outreach

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid traffic (known as "natural" or "organic" results) rather than direct traffic or paid traffic. Unpaid traffic may originate from different kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine behavior, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by their targeted audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher on the search engine results page (SERP). These visitors can then potentially be converted into customers.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, all webmasters only needed to submit the address of a page, or URL, to the various engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5] The process involves a search engine spider/crawler crawls a page and storing it on the search engine's own server. A second program, known as an indexer, extracts information about the page, such as the words it contains, where they are located, and any weight for specific words, as well as all links the page contains. All of this information is then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.

Website owners recognized the value of a high ranking and visibility in search engine results,[6] creating an opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[7]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[8][dubiousdiscuss] Web content providers also manipulated some attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[9] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank well in their search engine and that some webmasters were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[10]

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[11] Since the success and popularity of a search engine are determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results to any given search, poor quality or irrelevant search results could lead users to find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.

Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[12] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[13] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.[14]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[15][16] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[17] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[18]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[19] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[20] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[21] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[22]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[23] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[24] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[25] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[26]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[27] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[28] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[29]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[30] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[31] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[32]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[33] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[34] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[35] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[36] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[37] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[38] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[39] in addition to their URL submission console.[40] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[41] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[42]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[43] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[44] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[45] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[46]

Preventing crawling

[edit]

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[47] In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint not a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[48]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[49] Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[50] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[49]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[51] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[52]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[15][16][53] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[54] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[55] Both companies, however, quickly apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[56]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals. Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[57] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[58][59] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[60] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[61] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[49]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[62] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[63] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[64] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[65] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and Google remains the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[66] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[67] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68] That market share is achieved in a number of countries.

As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google is not the leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in a given market, it is lagging behind a local player. The most notable example markets are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the Czech Republic, where respectively Baidu, Yahoo! Japan, Naver, Yandex and Seznam are market leaders.

Successful search optimization for international markets may require professional translation of web pages, registration of a domain name with a top level domain in the target market, and web hosting that provides a local IP address. Otherwise, the fundamental elements of search optimization are essentially the same, regardless of language.[67]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[69][70]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[71][72]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ "Intro to Search Engine Optimization | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  7. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  8. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 189–211, November 17, 2020, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517, archived from the original on August 14, 2022, retrieved September 20, 2021
  9. ^ Pringle, G., Allison, L., and Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Proc. 7th Int. World Wide Web Conference. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  11. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  12. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  13. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  14. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  15. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  16. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  17. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  18. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  19. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  20. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  21. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  22. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  23. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  24. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  25. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  26. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  27. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  28. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  30. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  31. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  32. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  33. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  34. ^ "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  35. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  36. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  37. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  38. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  39. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  40. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  41. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  42. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  43. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  44. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  45. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  46. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  47. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  49. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  50. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  51. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  54. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  57. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  58. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  59. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  60. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  61. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  62. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  63. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  64. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  65. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  67. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  70. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  71. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  72. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-05-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

Search analytics is the use of search data to investigate particular interactions among Web searchers, the search engine, or the content during searching episodes.[1] The resulting analysis and aggregation of search engine statistics can be used in search engine marketing (SEM) and search engine optimization (SEO). In other words, search analytics helps website owners understand and improve their performance on search engines based on the outcome. For example, identifying highly valuable site visitors[2] or understanding user intent.[3] Search analytics includes search volume trends and analysis, reverse searching (entering websites to see their keywords), keyword monitoring, search result and advertisement history, advertisement spending statistics, website comparisons, affiliate marketing statistics, multivariate ad testing, etc.[4]

Data collection

[edit]

Search analytics data can be collected in several ways. Search engines provide access to their own data with services such as Google Analytics,[5] Google Trends, and Google Insights. Third-party services must collect their data from ISP's, phoning home software, or from scraping search engines. Getting traffic statistics from ISP's and phone homes provides for broader reporting of web traffic in addition to search analytics. Services that perform keyword monitoring only scrape a limited set of search results, depending on their clients' needs. Services providing reverse search, however, must scrape a large set of keywords from the search engines, usually in the millions, to find the keywords that everyone is using.[6]

Since search results, especially advertisements, differ depending on where you are searching from, data collection methods have to account for geographic location. Keyword monitors do this more easily since they typically know what location their client is targeting. However, to get an exhaustive reverse search, several locations need to be scraped for the same keyword.

Accuracy

[edit]

Search analytics accuracy depends on service being used, data collection method, and data freshness. Google releases its own data, but only in an aggregated way and often without assigning absolute values such as number of visitors to its graphs.[7] ISP logs and phone home methods are accurate for the population they sample, so sample size and demographics must be adequate to accurately represent the larger population. Scraping results can be highly accurate, especially when looking at the non-paid, organic search results. Paid results, from Google AdWords for example,[8] are often different for the same search depending on the time, geographic location, and history of searches from a particular computer. This means that scraping advertisers can be hit or miss.

Market conditions

[edit]

Taking a look at Google Insights to gauge the popularity of these services shows that compared to searches for the term AdWords (Google's popular search ad system), use of search analytics services is still very low, around 1-25% as of Oct. 2009.[9] This could point to a large opportunity for the users and makers of search analytics given that services have existed since 2004 with several new services being started since.

Calculations

[edit]
Sessions with Search = The number of sessions that used your site's search function at least once.
Percentage of sessions that used internal search = Sessions with Search / Total Sessions.
Total Unique Searches = The total number of times your site search was used. This excludes multiple searches on the same keyword during the same session.
Results Pageviews / Search = Pageviews of search result pages / Total Unique Searches.
Search Exits = The number of searches made immediately before leaving the site.
Percentage of Search Exits = Search Exits / Total Unique Searches
Search Refinements = The number of times a user searched again immediately after performing a search.
Percentage Search Refinements = The percentage of searches that resulted in a search refinement. Calculated as Search Refinements / Pageviews of search result pages.
Time after Search = The amount of time users spend on your site after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_duration across all searches / (search_transitions + 1)
Search Depth = The number of pages viewed after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_depth across all searches / (search_transitions + 1) [10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jansen, B. J. 2006. Search log analysis: What is it; what's been done; how to do it. Library and Information Science Research, 28(3), 407-432.
  2. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  3. ^ Rose, D.E., & Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user goals in web search. In S. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, & C. Wills (Eds.). Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW ’04) (pp. 13–19),. New York: ACM
  4. ^ Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P.A.; Hinsch, C. (2016). "Elements of Strategic Social Media Marketing: A Holistic Framework". Journal of Business Research. 70: 118–126. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ "Analytics Tools & Solutions for Your Business - Google Analytics". marketingplatform.google.com. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
  6. ^ Das, Abhishek (2018-06-02). APPLICATION OF DIGITAL MARKETING FOR LIFE SUCCESS IN BUSINESS. BPB Publications. ISBN 978-93-87284-84-5.
  7. ^ "About Google Trends – Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  8. ^ "Install Google Toolbar - Toolbar Help". support.google.com. Retrieved 2022-11-12.
  9. ^ "Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-12-30.
  10. ^ Google Analytics: How Site Search metrics are calculated?

Social media optimization (SMO) is the use of online platforms to generate income or publicity to increase the awareness of a brand, event, product or service. Types of social media involved include RSS feeds, blogging sites, social bookmarking sites, social news websites, video sharing websites such as Youtube and social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and X(Twitter). SMO is similar to search engine optimization (SEO) in that the goal is to drive web traffic, and draw attention to a company or creator. SMO's focal point is on gaining organic links to social media content. In contrast, SEO's core is about reaching the top of the search engine hierarchy.[1] In general, social media optimization refers to optimizing a website and its content to encourage more users to use and share links to the website across social media and networking sites.[2]

SMO is used to strategically create online content ranging from well-written text to eye-catching digital photos or video clips that encourages and entices people to engage with a website. Users share this content, via its weblink, with social media contacts and friends. Common examples of social media engagement are "liking and commenting on posts, retweeting, embedding, sharing, and promoting content".[3] Social media optimization is also an effective way of implementing online reputation management (ORM), meaning that if someone posts bad reviews of a business, an SMO strategy can ensure that the negative feedback is not the first link to come up in a list of search engine results.[4]

In the 2010s, with social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating web traffic. Publishers such as The Economist employ large social media teams to optimize their online posts and maximize traffic,[5] while other major publishers now use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology to generate higher volumes of web traffic.[6]

Relationship with search engine optimization

[edit]
The flow and proliferation of content and link shares via social media lead to greater search engine optimization.

Social media optimization is an increasingly important factor in search engine optimization, which is the process of designing a website in a way so that it has as high a ranking as possible on search engines. Search engines are increasingly utilizing the recommendations of users of social networks such as Reddit, Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Instagram to rank pages in the search engine result pages.[7] The implication is that when a webpage is shared or "liked" by a user on a social network, it counts as a "vote" for that webpage's quality. Thus, search engines can use such votes accordingly to properly ranked websites in search engine results pages. Furthermore, since it is more difficult to tip the scales or influence the search engines in this way, search engines are putting more stock into social search.[7] This, coupled with increasingly personalized search based on interests and location, has significantly increased the importance of a social media presence in search engine optimization. Due to personalized search results, location-based social media presences on websites such as Yelp, Google Places, Foursquare, and Yahoo! Local have become increasingly important. While social media optimization is related to search engine marketing, it differs in several ways. Primarily, SMO focuses on driving web traffic from sources other than search engines, though improved search engine ranking is also a benefit of successful social media optimization. Further, SMO is helpful to target particular geographic regions in order to target and reach potential customers. This helps in lead generation (finding new customers) and contributes to high conversion rates (i.e., converting previously uninterested individuals into people who are interested in a brand or organization).

Relationship with viral marketing

[edit]

Social media optimization is in many ways connected to the technique of viral marketing or "viral seeding" where word of mouth is created through the use of networking in social bookmarking, video and photo sharing websites. An effective SMO campaign can harness the power of viral marketing; for example, 80% of activity on Pinterest is generated through "repinning."[citation needed] Furthermore, by following social trends and utilizing alternative social networks, websites can retain existing followers while also attracting new ones. This allows businesses to build an online following and presence, all linking back to the company's website for increased traffic. For example, with an effective social bookmarking campaign, not only can website traffic be increased, but a site's rankings can also be increased. In a similar way, the engagement with blogs creates a similar result by sharing content through the use of RSS in the blogosphere. Social media optimization is considered an integral part of an online reputation management (ORM) or search engine reputation management (SERM) strategy for organizations or individuals who care about their online presence.[8] SMO is one of six key influencers that affect Social Commerce Construct (SCC). Online activities such as consumers' evaluations and advices on products and services constitute part of what creates a Social Commerce Construct (SCC).[citation needed]

Social media optimization is not limited to marketing and brand building. Increasingly, smart businesses are integrating social media participation as part of their knowledge management strategy (i.e., product/service development, recruiting, employee engagement and turnover, brand building, customer satisfaction and relations, business development and more). Additionally, social media optimization can be implemented to foster a community of the associated site, allowing for a healthy business-to-consumer (B2C) relationship.[9]

Origins and implementation

[edit]

According to technologist Danny Sullivan, the term "social media optimization" was first used and described by marketer Rohit Bhargava[10][11] on his marketing blog in August 2006. In the same post, Bhargava established the five important rules of social media optimization. Bhargava believed that by following his rules, anyone could influence the levels of traffic and engagement on their site, increase popularity, and ensure that it ranks highly in search engine results. An additional 11 SMO rules have since been added to the list by other marketing contributors.

The 16 rules of SMO, according to one source, are as follows:[12]

  1. Increase your linkability
  2. Make tagging and bookmarking easy
  3. Reward inbound links
  4. Help your content to "travel" via sharing
  5. Encourage the mashup, where users are allowed to remix content
  6. Be a user resource, even if it doesn't help you (e.g., provide resources and information for users)
  7. Reward helpful and valuable users
  8. Participate (join the online conversation)
  9. Know how to target your audience
  10. Create new, quality content ("web scraping" of existing online content is ignored by good search engines)
  11. Be "real" in the tone and style of the posts
  12. Don't forget your roots; be humble
  13. Don't be afraid to experiment, innovate, try new things and "stay fresh"
  14. Develop an SMO strategy
  15. Choose your SMO tactics wisely
  16. Make SMO a key part of your marketing process and develop company best practices

Bhargava's initial five rules were more specifically designed to SMO, while the list is now much broader and addresses everything that can be done across different social media platforms. According to author and CEO of TopRank Online Marketing, Lee Odden, a Social Media Strategy is also necessary to ensure optimization. This is a similar concept to Bhargava's list of rules for SMO.

The Social Media Strategy may consider:[13]

  1. Objectives e.g. creating brand awareness and using social media for external communications.
  2. Listening e.g. monitoring conversations relating to customers and business objectives.
  3. Audience e.g. finding out who the customers are, what they do, who they are influenced by, and what they frequently talk about. It is important to work out what customers want in exchange for their online engagement and attention.
  4. Participation and content e.g. establishing a presence and community online and engaging with users by sharing useful and interesting information.
  5. Measurement e.g. keeping a record of likes and comments on posts, and the number of sales to monitor growth and determine which tactics are most useful in optimizing social media.

According to Lon Safko and David K. Brake in The Social Media Bible, it is also important to act like a publisher by maintaining an effective organizational strategy, to have an original concept and unique "edge" that differentiates one's approach from competitors, and to experiment with new ideas if things do not work the first time.[4] If a business is blog-based, an effective method of SMO is using widgets that allow users to share content to their personal social media platforms. This will ultimately reach a wider target audience and drive more traffic to the original post. Blog widgets and plug-ins for post-sharing are most commonly linked to Facebook, LinkedIn and x.com. They occasionally also link to social media platforms such as Tumblr and Pinterest. Many sharing widgets also include user counters which indicate how many times the content has been liked and shared across different social media pages. This can influence whether or not new users will engage with the post, and also gives businesses an idea of what kind of posts are most successful at engaging audiences. By using relevant and trending keywords in titles and throughout blog posts, a business can also increase search engine optimization and the chances of their content of being read and shared by a large audience.[13] The root of effective SMO is the content that is being posted, so professional content creation tools can be very beneficial. These can include editing programs such as Photoshop, GIMP, Final Cut Pro, and Dreamweaver. Many websites also offer customization options such as different layouts to personalize a page and create a point of difference.[4]

Publishing industry

[edit]

With social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating traffic. A report by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how a 'second wave of disruption' had hit news organizations,[14] with publishers such as The Economist having to employ large social media teams to optimize their posts, and maximize traffic.[5] Within the context of the publishing industry, even professional fields are utilizing SMO. Because doctors want to maximize exposure to their research findings SMO has also found a place in the medical field.[15]

Today, 3.8 billion people globally are using some form of social media.[citation needed] People frequently obtain health-related information from online social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Healthcare professionals and scientists can communicate with other medical-counterparts to discuss research and findings through social media platforms. These platforms provide researchers with data sets and surveillance that help detect patterns and behavior in preventing, informing, and studying global disease; COVID-19. Additionally, researchers utilize SMO to reach and recruit hard-to-reach patients. SMO narrows specified demographics that filter necessary data in a given study.[citation needed]

Social network games

[edit]

Social media gaming is online gaming activity performed through social media sites with friends and online gaming activity that promotes social media interaction. Examples of the former include FarmVille, Clash of Clans, Clash Royale, FrontierVille, and Mafia Wars. In these games a player's social network is exploited to recruit additional players and allies. An example of the latter is Empire Avenue, a virtual stock exchange where players buy and sell shares of each other's social network worth. Nielsen Media Research estimates that, as of June 2010, social networking and playing online games account for about one-third of all online activity by Americans.[16]

Facebook

[edit]

Facebook has in recent years become a popular channel for advertising, alongside traditional forms such as television, radio, and print. With over 1 billion active users, and 50% of those users logging into their accounts every day[17] it is an important communication platform that businesses can utilize and optimize to promote their brand and drive traffic to their websites. There are three commonly used strategies to increase advertising reach on Facebook:

  1. Improving the effectiveness of posts, achieved by adjusting the length and timing of posts to influence the number of likes and comments it receives. This will help the post reach a greater number of Facebook users, ultimately increasing its reach.
  2. Increasing network size, achieved by analyzing user behavior to determine how often to post and what type of content to post.
  3. Buying more reach, achieved by paying Facebook to advertise a post.

Improving effectiveness and increasing network size are organic approaches, while buying more reach is a paid approach which does not require any further action.[18] Most businesses will attempt an "organic" approach to gaining a significant following before considering a paid approach. Because Facebook requires a login, it is important that posts are public to ensure they will reach the widest possible audience. Posts that have been heavily shared and interacted with by users are displayed as 'highlighted posts' at the top of newsfeeds. In order to achieve this status, the posts need to be engaging, interesting, or useful. This can be achieved by being spontaneous, asking questions, addressing current events and issues, and optimizing trending hashtags and keywords. The more engagement a post receives, the further it will spread and the more likely it is to feature on first in search results.

Due to its popularity and widespread use, Facebook is a useful channel for social media optimization.

Another organic approach to Facebook optimization is cross-linking different social platforms. By posting links to websites or social media sites in the profile 'about' section, it is possible to direct traffic and ultimately increase search engine optimization. Another option is to share links to relevant videos and blog posts.[13] Facebook Connect is a functionality that launched in 2008 to allow Facebook users to sign up to different websites, enter competitions, and access exclusive promotions by logging in with their existing Facebook account details. This is beneficial to users as they don't have to create a new login every time they want to sign up to a website, but also beneficial to businesses as Facebook users become more likely to share their content. Often the two are interlinked, where in order to access parts of a website, a user has to like or share certain things on their personal profile or invite a number of friends to like a page. This can lead to greater traffic flow to a website as it reaches a wider audience. Businesses have more opportunities to reach their target markets if they choose a paid approach to SMO. When Facebook users create an account, they are urged to fill out their personal details such as gender, age, location, education, current and previous employers, religious and political views, interests, and personal preferences such as movie and music tastes. Facebook then takes this information and allows advertisers to use it to determine how to best market themselves to users that they know will be interested in their product. This can also be known as micro-targeting. If a user clicks on a link to like a page, it will show up on their profile and newsfeed. This then feeds back into organic social media optimization, as friends of the user will see this and be encouraged to click on the page themselves. Although advertisers are buying mass reach, they are attracting a customer base with a genuine interest in their product. Once a customer base has been established through a paid approach, businesses will often run promotions and competitions to attract more organic followers.[12]

The number of businesses that use Facebook to advertise also holds significant relevance. in 2017, there were three million businesses that advertised on Facebook.[19] This makes Facebook the world's largest platform for social media advertising. What also holds importance is the amount of money leading businesses are spending on Facebook advertising alone. Procter & Gamble spend $60 million every year on Facebook advertising.[20] Other advertisers on Facebook include Microsoft, with a yearly spend of £35 million, Amazon, Nestle and American Express all with yearly expenditures above £25 million per year.

Furthermore, the number of small businesses advertising on Facebook is of relevance. This number has grown rapidly over the upcoming years and demonstrates how important social media advertising actually is. Currently 70% of the UK's small businesses use Facebook advertising.[21] This is a substantial number of advertisers. Almost half of the world's small businesses use social media marketing product of some sort. This demonstrates the impact that social media has had on the current digital marketing era.

Engagement Rate

[edit]

ER (Engagement Rate) represents the activity of users specific for a certain profile on Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok or any other Social Media. A common way to calculate it is the following:

In the above formula followers is the total number of followers (friends, subscribers, etc), interactions stands for the number of interactions, such as likes, comments, personal messages, shares. The latter is averaged over the certain period of time, which should normally be short enough to ensure the variance in followers number is negligible during this period.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Tuten, Tracy; Solomon, Michael (2018). Social Media Marketing (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 229–230. ISBN 9781526423863.
  2. ^ Sturgis, Ingrid (2014). "Social Media Optimization". In Harvey, Kerric (ed.). Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics. Vol. 3. CQ Press. pp. 1167–1171.
  3. ^ Bradley, S. V. (2015). Win the game of Google-opoly: Unlocking the secret strategy of search engines. Wiley. ISBN 9781119002581.
  4. ^ a b c Frick, T (2010). Return on engagement: Content, strategy and design techniques for digital marketing. Oxford: Focal. ISBN 9781136030253.
  5. ^ a b Preston, Peter (July 31, 2016). "Print still has a future, and Le Monde can prove it. Aux armes, citoyens!". The Guardian.
  6. ^ Smith, Mark (July 22, 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". BBC News.
  7. ^ a b Enge, Eric (November 30, 2010). "Search Engine Optimization in an Increasingly Social World". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved July 17, 2012.
  8. ^ Cody, Steve (April 18, 2014). "7 Reasons You Need to Manage Your Online Presence More Carefully". Inc.com. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  9. ^ Chaturvedi, Madhur (April 22, 2013). "Effective Social Media Strategies – Four Tips, Four Benefits". Oracle.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
  10. ^ Sullivan, Danny (August 29, 2006). "Social Media Optimization: It's Like SEO, For Social Sites". blog.searchenginewatch.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2007. Retrieved September 6, 2007.
  11. ^ Olthuis, Cameron (August 15, 2006). "Introduction to Social Media Optimization". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved March 8, 2013.
  12. ^ a b Burcher, N (2012). Paid, owned, earned: Maximising marketing returns in a socially connected world. London: Kogan Page. pp. 104–105. ISBN 9780749465636.
  13. ^ a b c Odden, L (2012). Optimize: How to attract and engage more customers by integrating SEO, social media, and content marketing. NJ: Wiley. ISBN 9781118167779. Social media optimization.
  14. ^ Wakefield, Jane (June 15, 2016). "Social media 'outstrips TV' as news source for young people". BBC News.
  15. ^ Chi, Gerald; Cushman, Mary (April 2019). "Social media optimization in medicine: A journal's perspective: Editorial". Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 3 (2): 144–146. doi:10.1002/rth2.12199. PMC 6462736. PMID 31011694.
  16. ^ "What Americans Do Online: Social Media And Games Dominate Activity". Nielsen Wire. Retrieved March 22, 2011.
  17. ^ Safko, L (2009). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. ^ Ballings, Michel; Van den Poel, Dirk; Bogaert, Matthias (March 1, 2016). "Social media optimization: Identifying an optimal strategy for increasing network size on Facebook". Omega. Business Analytics. 59, Part A: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.017.
  19. ^ "3 Million Advertisers on Facebook". Facebook for Business. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  20. ^ "These Are The 35 Biggest Advertisers On Facebook". Business Insider. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  21. ^ "Almost Half of Small Businesses Marketing Products on Social Media (INFOGRAPHIC)". smallbiztrends.com. October 7, 2016. Retrieved May 12, 2017.

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid traffic (known as "natural" or "organic" results) rather than direct traffic or paid traffic. Unpaid traffic may originate from different kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine behavior, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by their targeted audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher on the search engine results page (SERP). These visitors can then potentially be converted into customers.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, all webmasters only needed to submit the address of a page, or URL, to the various engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5] The process involves a search engine spider/crawler crawls a page and storing it on the search engine's own server. A second program, known as an indexer, extracts information about the page, such as the words it contains, where they are located, and any weight for specific words, as well as all links the page contains. All of this information is then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.

Website owners recognized the value of a high ranking and visibility in search engine results,[6] creating an opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[7]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[8][dubiousdiscuss] Web content providers also manipulated some attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[9] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank well in their search engine and that some webmasters were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[10]

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[11] Since the success and popularity of a search engine are determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results to any given search, poor quality or irrelevant search results could lead users to find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.

Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[12] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[13] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.[14]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[15][16] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[17] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[18]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[19] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[20] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[21] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[22]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[23] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[24] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[25] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[26]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[27] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[28] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[29]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[30] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[31] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[32]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[33] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[34] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[35] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[36] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[37] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[38] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[39] in addition to their URL submission console.[40] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[41] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[42]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[43] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[44] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[45] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[46]

Preventing crawling

[edit]

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[47] In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint not a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[48]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[49] Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[50] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[49]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[51] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[52]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[15][16][53] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[54] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[55] Both companies, however, quickly apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[56]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals. Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[57] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[58][59] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[60] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[61] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[49]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[62] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[63] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[64] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[65] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and Google remains the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[66] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[67] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68] That market share is achieved in a number of countries.

As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google is not the leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in a given market, it is lagging behind a local player. The most notable example markets are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the Czech Republic, where respectively Baidu, Yahoo! Japan, Naver, Yandex and Seznam are market leaders.

Successful search optimization for international markets may require professional translation of web pages, registration of a domain name with a top level domain in the target market, and web hosting that provides a local IP address. Otherwise, the fundamental elements of search optimization are essentially the same, regardless of language.[67]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[69][70]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[71][72]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ "Intro to Search Engine Optimization | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  7. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  8. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 189–211, November 17, 2020, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517, archived from the original on August 14, 2022, retrieved September 20, 2021
  9. ^ Pringle, G., Allison, L., and Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Proc. 7th Int. World Wide Web Conference. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  11. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  12. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  13. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  14. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  15. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  16. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  17. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  18. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  19. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  20. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  21. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  22. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  23. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  24. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  25. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  26. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  27. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  28. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  30. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  31. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  32. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  33. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  34. ^ "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  35. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  36. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  37. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  38. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  39. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  40. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  41. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  42. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  43. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  44. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  45. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  46. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  47. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  49. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  50. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  51. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  54. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  57. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  58. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  59. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  60. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  61. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  62. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  63. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  64. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  65. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  67. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  70. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  71. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  72. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-05-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

Search analytics is the use of search data to investigate particular interactions among Web searchers, the search engine, or the content during searching episodes.[1] The resulting analysis and aggregation of search engine statistics can be used in search engine marketing (SEM) and search engine optimization (SEO). In other words, search analytics helps website owners understand and improve their performance on search engines based on the outcome. For example, identifying highly valuable site visitors[2] or understanding user intent.[3] Search analytics includes search volume trends and analysis, reverse searching (entering websites to see their keywords), keyword monitoring, search result and advertisement history, advertisement spending statistics, website comparisons, affiliate marketing statistics, multivariate ad testing, etc.[4]

Data collection

[edit]

Search analytics data can be collected in several ways. Search engines provide access to their own data with services such as Google Analytics,[5] Google Trends, and Google Insights. Third-party services must collect their data from ISP's, phoning home software, or from scraping search engines. Getting traffic statistics from ISP's and phone homes provides for broader reporting of web traffic in addition to search analytics. Services that perform keyword monitoring only scrape a limited set of search results, depending on their clients' needs. Services providing reverse search, however, must scrape a large set of keywords from the search engines, usually in the millions, to find the keywords that everyone is using.[6]

Since search results, especially advertisements, differ depending on where you are searching from, data collection methods have to account for geographic location. Keyword monitors do this more easily since they typically know what location their client is targeting. However, to get an exhaustive reverse search, several locations need to be scraped for the same keyword.

Accuracy

[edit]

Search analytics accuracy depends on service being used, data collection method, and data freshness. Google releases its own data, but only in an aggregated way and often without assigning absolute values such as number of visitors to its graphs.[7] ISP logs and phone home methods are accurate for the population they sample, so sample size and demographics must be adequate to accurately represent the larger population. Scraping results can be highly accurate, especially when looking at the non-paid, organic search results. Paid results, from Google AdWords for example,[8] are often different for the same search depending on the time, geographic location, and history of searches from a particular computer. This means that scraping advertisers can be hit or miss.

Market conditions

[edit]

Taking a look at Google Insights to gauge the popularity of these services shows that compared to searches for the term AdWords (Google's popular search ad system), use of search analytics services is still very low, around 1-25% as of Oct. 2009.[9] This could point to a large opportunity for the users and makers of search analytics given that services have existed since 2004 with several new services being started since.

Calculations

[edit]
Sessions with Search = The number of sessions that used your site's search function at least once.
Percentage of sessions that used internal search = Sessions with Search / Total Sessions.
Total Unique Searches = The total number of times your site search was used. This excludes multiple searches on the same keyword during the same session.
Results Pageviews / Search = Pageviews of search result pages / Total Unique Searches.
Search Exits = The number of searches made immediately before leaving the site.
Percentage of Search Exits = Search Exits / Total Unique Searches
Search Refinements = The number of times a user searched again immediately after performing a search.
Percentage Search Refinements = The percentage of searches that resulted in a search refinement. Calculated as Search Refinements / Pageviews of search result pages.
Time after Search = The amount of time users spend on your site after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_duration across all searches / (search_transitions + 1)
Search Depth = The number of pages viewed after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_depth across all searches / (search_transitions + 1) [10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jansen, B. J. 2006. Search log analysis: What is it; what's been done; how to do it. Library and Information Science Research, 28(3), 407-432.
  2. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  3. ^ Rose, D.E., & Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user goals in web search. In S. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, & C. Wills (Eds.). Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW ’04) (pp. 13–19),. New York: ACM
  4. ^ Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P.A.; Hinsch, C. (2016). "Elements of Strategic Social Media Marketing: A Holistic Framework". Journal of Business Research. 70: 118–126. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ "Analytics Tools & Solutions for Your Business - Google Analytics". marketingplatform.google.com. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
  6. ^ Das, Abhishek (2018-06-02). APPLICATION OF DIGITAL MARKETING FOR LIFE SUCCESS IN BUSINESS. BPB Publications. ISBN 978-93-87284-84-5.
  7. ^ "About Google Trends – Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  8. ^ "Install Google Toolbar - Toolbar Help". support.google.com. Retrieved 2022-11-12.
  9. ^ "Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-12-30.
  10. ^ Google Analytics: How Site Search metrics are calculated?

Social media optimization (SMO) is the use of online platforms to generate income or publicity to increase the awareness of a brand, event, product or service. Types of social media involved include RSS feeds, blogging sites, social bookmarking sites, social news websites, video sharing websites such as Youtube and social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and X(Twitter). SMO is similar to search engine optimization (SEO) in that the goal is to drive web traffic, and draw attention to a company or creator. SMO's focal point is on gaining organic links to social media content. In contrast, SEO's core is about reaching the top of the search engine hierarchy.[1] In general, social media optimization refers to optimizing a website and its content to encourage more users to use and share links to the website across social media and networking sites.[2]

SMO is used to strategically create online content ranging from well-written text to eye-catching digital photos or video clips that encourages and entices people to engage with a website. Users share this content, via its weblink, with social media contacts and friends. Common examples of social media engagement are "liking and commenting on posts, retweeting, embedding, sharing, and promoting content".[3] Social media optimization is also an effective way of implementing online reputation management (ORM), meaning that if someone posts bad reviews of a business, an SMO strategy can ensure that the negative feedback is not the first link to come up in a list of search engine results.[4]

In the 2010s, with social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating web traffic. Publishers such as The Economist employ large social media teams to optimize their online posts and maximize traffic,[5] while other major publishers now use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology to generate higher volumes of web traffic.[6]

Relationship with search engine optimization

[edit]
The flow and proliferation of content and link shares via social media lead to greater search engine optimization.

Social media optimization is an increasingly important factor in search engine optimization, which is the process of designing a website in a way so that it has as high a ranking as possible on search engines. Search engines are increasingly utilizing the recommendations of users of social networks such as Reddit, Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Instagram to rank pages in the search engine result pages.[7] The implication is that when a webpage is shared or "liked" by a user on a social network, it counts as a "vote" for that webpage's quality. Thus, search engines can use such votes accordingly to properly ranked websites in search engine results pages. Furthermore, since it is more difficult to tip the scales or influence the search engines in this way, search engines are putting more stock into social search.[7] This, coupled with increasingly personalized search based on interests and location, has significantly increased the importance of a social media presence in search engine optimization. Due to personalized search results, location-based social media presences on websites such as Yelp, Google Places, Foursquare, and Yahoo! Local have become increasingly important. While social media optimization is related to search engine marketing, it differs in several ways. Primarily, SMO focuses on driving web traffic from sources other than search engines, though improved search engine ranking is also a benefit of successful social media optimization. Further, SMO is helpful to target particular geographic regions in order to target and reach potential customers. This helps in lead generation (finding new customers) and contributes to high conversion rates (i.e., converting previously uninterested individuals into people who are interested in a brand or organization).

Relationship with viral marketing

[edit]

Social media optimization is in many ways connected to the technique of viral marketing or "viral seeding" where word of mouth is created through the use of networking in social bookmarking, video and photo sharing websites. An effective SMO campaign can harness the power of viral marketing; for example, 80% of activity on Pinterest is generated through "repinning."[citation needed] Furthermore, by following social trends and utilizing alternative social networks, websites can retain existing followers while also attracting new ones. This allows businesses to build an online following and presence, all linking back to the company's website for increased traffic. For example, with an effective social bookmarking campaign, not only can website traffic be increased, but a site's rankings can also be increased. In a similar way, the engagement with blogs creates a similar result by sharing content through the use of RSS in the blogosphere. Social media optimization is considered an integral part of an online reputation management (ORM) or search engine reputation management (SERM) strategy for organizations or individuals who care about their online presence.[8] SMO is one of six key influencers that affect Social Commerce Construct (SCC). Online activities such as consumers' evaluations and advices on products and services constitute part of what creates a Social Commerce Construct (SCC).[citation needed]

Social media optimization is not limited to marketing and brand building. Increasingly, smart businesses are integrating social media participation as part of their knowledge management strategy (i.e., product/service development, recruiting, employee engagement and turnover, brand building, customer satisfaction and relations, business development and more). Additionally, social media optimization can be implemented to foster a community of the associated site, allowing for a healthy business-to-consumer (B2C) relationship.[9]

Origins and implementation

[edit]

According to technologist Danny Sullivan, the term "social media optimization" was first used and described by marketer Rohit Bhargava[10][11] on his marketing blog in August 2006. In the same post, Bhargava established the five important rules of social media optimization. Bhargava believed that by following his rules, anyone could influence the levels of traffic and engagement on their site, increase popularity, and ensure that it ranks highly in search engine results. An additional 11 SMO rules have since been added to the list by other marketing contributors.

The 16 rules of SMO, according to one source, are as follows:[12]

  1. Increase your linkability
  2. Make tagging and bookmarking easy
  3. Reward inbound links
  4. Help your content to "travel" via sharing
  5. Encourage the mashup, where users are allowed to remix content
  6. Be a user resource, even if it doesn't help you (e.g., provide resources and information for users)
  7. Reward helpful and valuable users
  8. Participate (join the online conversation)
  9. Know how to target your audience
  10. Create new, quality content ("web scraping" of existing online content is ignored by good search engines)
  11. Be "real" in the tone and style of the posts
  12. Don't forget your roots; be humble
  13. Don't be afraid to experiment, innovate, try new things and "stay fresh"
  14. Develop an SMO strategy
  15. Choose your SMO tactics wisely
  16. Make SMO a key part of your marketing process and develop company best practices

Bhargava's initial five rules were more specifically designed to SMO, while the list is now much broader and addresses everything that can be done across different social media platforms. According to author and CEO of TopRank Online Marketing, Lee Odden, a Social Media Strategy is also necessary to ensure optimization. This is a similar concept to Bhargava's list of rules for SMO.

The Social Media Strategy may consider:[13]

  1. Objectives e.g. creating brand awareness and using social media for external communications.
  2. Listening e.g. monitoring conversations relating to customers and business objectives.
  3. Audience e.g. finding out who the customers are, what they do, who they are influenced by, and what they frequently talk about. It is important to work out what customers want in exchange for their online engagement and attention.
  4. Participation and content e.g. establishing a presence and community online and engaging with users by sharing useful and interesting information.
  5. Measurement e.g. keeping a record of likes and comments on posts, and the number of sales to monitor growth and determine which tactics are most useful in optimizing social media.

According to Lon Safko and David K. Brake in The Social Media Bible, it is also important to act like a publisher by maintaining an effective organizational strategy, to have an original concept and unique "edge" that differentiates one's approach from competitors, and to experiment with new ideas if things do not work the first time.[4] If a business is blog-based, an effective method of SMO is using widgets that allow users to share content to their personal social media platforms. This will ultimately reach a wider target audience and drive more traffic to the original post. Blog widgets and plug-ins for post-sharing are most commonly linked to Facebook, LinkedIn and x.com. They occasionally also link to social media platforms such as Tumblr and Pinterest. Many sharing widgets also include user counters which indicate how many times the content has been liked and shared across different social media pages. This can influence whether or not new users will engage with the post, and also gives businesses an idea of what kind of posts are most successful at engaging audiences. By using relevant and trending keywords in titles and throughout blog posts, a business can also increase search engine optimization and the chances of their content of being read and shared by a large audience.[13] The root of effective SMO is the content that is being posted, so professional content creation tools can be very beneficial. These can include editing programs such as Photoshop, GIMP, Final Cut Pro, and Dreamweaver. Many websites also offer customization options such as different layouts to personalize a page and create a point of difference.[4]

Publishing industry

[edit]

With social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating traffic. A report by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how a 'second wave of disruption' had hit news organizations,[14] with publishers such as The Economist having to employ large social media teams to optimize their posts, and maximize traffic.[5] Within the context of the publishing industry, even professional fields are utilizing SMO. Because doctors want to maximize exposure to their research findings SMO has also found a place in the medical field.[15]

Today, 3.8 billion people globally are using some form of social media.[citation needed] People frequently obtain health-related information from online social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Healthcare professionals and scientists can communicate with other medical-counterparts to discuss research and findings through social media platforms. These platforms provide researchers with data sets and surveillance that help detect patterns and behavior in preventing, informing, and studying global disease; COVID-19. Additionally, researchers utilize SMO to reach and recruit hard-to-reach patients. SMO narrows specified demographics that filter necessary data in a given study.[citation needed]

Social network games

[edit]

Social media gaming is online gaming activity performed through social media sites with friends and online gaming activity that promotes social media interaction. Examples of the former include FarmVille, Clash of Clans, Clash Royale, FrontierVille, and Mafia Wars. In these games a player's social network is exploited to recruit additional players and allies. An example of the latter is Empire Avenue, a virtual stock exchange where players buy and sell shares of each other's social network worth. Nielsen Media Research estimates that, as of June 2010, social networking and playing online games account for about one-third of all online activity by Americans.[16]

Facebook

[edit]

Facebook has in recent years become a popular channel for advertising, alongside traditional forms such as television, radio, and print. With over 1 billion active users, and 50% of those users logging into their accounts every day[17] it is an important communication platform that businesses can utilize and optimize to promote their brand and drive traffic to their websites. There are three commonly used strategies to increase advertising reach on Facebook:

  1. Improving the effectiveness of posts, achieved by adjusting the length and timing of posts to influence the number of likes and comments it receives. This will help the post reach a greater number of Facebook users, ultimately increasing its reach.
  2. Increasing network size, achieved by analyzing user behavior to determine how often to post and what type of content to post.
  3. Buying more reach, achieved by paying Facebook to advertise a post.

Improving effectiveness and increasing network size are organic approaches, while buying more reach is a paid approach which does not require any further action.[18] Most businesses will attempt an "organic" approach to gaining a significant following before considering a paid approach. Because Facebook requires a login, it is important that posts are public to ensure they will reach the widest possible audience. Posts that have been heavily shared and interacted with by users are displayed as 'highlighted posts' at the top of newsfeeds. In order to achieve this status, the posts need to be engaging, interesting, or useful. This can be achieved by being spontaneous, asking questions, addressing current events and issues, and optimizing trending hashtags and keywords. The more engagement a post receives, the further it will spread and the more likely it is to feature on first in search results.

Due to its popularity and widespread use, Facebook is a useful channel for social media optimization.

Another organic approach to Facebook optimization is cross-linking different social platforms. By posting links to websites or social media sites in the profile 'about' section, it is possible to direct traffic and ultimately increase search engine optimization. Another option is to share links to relevant videos and blog posts.[13] Facebook Connect is a functionality that launched in 2008 to allow Facebook users to sign up to different websites, enter competitions, and access exclusive promotions by logging in with their existing Facebook account details. This is beneficial to users as they don't have to create a new login every time they want to sign up to a website, but also beneficial to businesses as Facebook users become more likely to share their content. Often the two are interlinked, where in order to access parts of a website, a user has to like or share certain things on their personal profile or invite a number of friends to like a page. This can lead to greater traffic flow to a website as it reaches a wider audience. Businesses have more opportunities to reach their target markets if they choose a paid approach to SMO. When Facebook users create an account, they are urged to fill out their personal details such as gender, age, location, education, current and previous employers, religious and political views, interests, and personal preferences such as movie and music tastes. Facebook then takes this information and allows advertisers to use it to determine how to best market themselves to users that they know will be interested in their product. This can also be known as micro-targeting. If a user clicks on a link to like a page, it will show up on their profile and newsfeed. This then feeds back into organic social media optimization, as friends of the user will see this and be encouraged to click on the page themselves. Although advertisers are buying mass reach, they are attracting a customer base with a genuine interest in their product. Once a customer base has been established through a paid approach, businesses will often run promotions and competitions to attract more organic followers.[12]

The number of businesses that use Facebook to advertise also holds significant relevance. in 2017, there were three million businesses that advertised on Facebook.[19] This makes Facebook the world's largest platform for social media advertising. What also holds importance is the amount of money leading businesses are spending on Facebook advertising alone. Procter & Gamble spend $60 million every year on Facebook advertising.[20] Other advertisers on Facebook include Microsoft, with a yearly spend of £35 million, Amazon, Nestle and American Express all with yearly expenditures above £25 million per year.

Furthermore, the number of small businesses advertising on Facebook is of relevance. This number has grown rapidly over the upcoming years and demonstrates how important social media advertising actually is. Currently 70% of the UK's small businesses use Facebook advertising.[21] This is a substantial number of advertisers. Almost half of the world's small businesses use social media marketing product of some sort. This demonstrates the impact that social media has had on the current digital marketing era.

Engagement Rate

[edit]

ER (Engagement Rate) represents the activity of users specific for a certain profile on Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok or any other Social Media. A common way to calculate it is the following:

In the above formula followers is the total number of followers (friends, subscribers, etc), interactions stands for the number of interactions, such as likes, comments, personal messages, shares. The latter is averaged over the certain period of time, which should normally be short enough to ensure the variance in followers number is negligible during this period.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Tuten, Tracy; Solomon, Michael (2018). Social Media Marketing (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 229–230. ISBN 9781526423863.
  2. ^ Sturgis, Ingrid (2014). "Social Media Optimization". In Harvey, Kerric (ed.). Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics. Vol. 3. CQ Press. pp. 1167–1171.
  3. ^ Bradley, S. V. (2015). Win the game of Google-opoly: Unlocking the secret strategy of search engines. Wiley. ISBN 9781119002581.
  4. ^ a b c Frick, T (2010). Return on engagement: Content, strategy and design techniques for digital marketing. Oxford: Focal. ISBN 9781136030253.
  5. ^ a b Preston, Peter (July 31, 2016). "Print still has a future, and Le Monde can prove it. Aux armes, citoyens!". The Guardian.
  6. ^ Smith, Mark (July 22, 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". BBC News.
  7. ^ a b Enge, Eric (November 30, 2010). "Search Engine Optimization in an Increasingly Social World". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved July 17, 2012.
  8. ^ Cody, Steve (April 18, 2014). "7 Reasons You Need to Manage Your Online Presence More Carefully". Inc.com. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  9. ^ Chaturvedi, Madhur (April 22, 2013). "Effective Social Media Strategies – Four Tips, Four Benefits". Oracle.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
  10. ^ Sullivan, Danny (August 29, 2006). "Social Media Optimization: It's Like SEO, For Social Sites". blog.searchenginewatch.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2007. Retrieved September 6, 2007.
  11. ^ Olthuis, Cameron (August 15, 2006). "Introduction to Social Media Optimization". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved March 8, 2013.
  12. ^ a b Burcher, N (2012). Paid, owned, earned: Maximising marketing returns in a socially connected world. London: Kogan Page. pp. 104–105. ISBN 9780749465636.
  13. ^ a b c Odden, L (2012). Optimize: How to attract and engage more customers by integrating SEO, social media, and content marketing. NJ: Wiley. ISBN 9781118167779. Social media optimization.
  14. ^ Wakefield, Jane (June 15, 2016). "Social media 'outstrips TV' as news source for young people". BBC News.
  15. ^ Chi, Gerald; Cushman, Mary (April 2019). "Social media optimization in medicine: A journal's perspective: Editorial". Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 3 (2): 144–146. doi:10.1002/rth2.12199. PMC 6462736. PMID 31011694.
  16. ^ "What Americans Do Online: Social Media And Games Dominate Activity". Nielsen Wire. Retrieved March 22, 2011.
  17. ^ Safko, L (2009). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. ^ Ballings, Michel; Van den Poel, Dirk; Bogaert, Matthias (March 1, 2016). "Social media optimization: Identifying an optimal strategy for increasing network size on Facebook". Omega. Business Analytics. 59, Part A: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.017.
  19. ^ "3 Million Advertisers on Facebook". Facebook for Business. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  20. ^ "These Are The 35 Biggest Advertisers On Facebook". Business Insider. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  21. ^ "Almost Half of Small Businesses Marketing Products on Social Media (INFOGRAPHIC)". smallbiztrends.com. October 7, 2016. Retrieved May 12, 2017.

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid traffic (known as "natural" or "organic" results) rather than direct traffic or paid traffic. Unpaid traffic may originate from different kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine behavior, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by their targeted audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher on the search engine results page (SERP). These visitors can then potentially be converted into customers.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, all webmasters only needed to submit the address of a page, or URL, to the various engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5] The process involves a search engine spider/crawler crawls a page and storing it on the search engine's own server. A second program, known as an indexer, extracts information about the page, such as the words it contains, where they are located, and any weight for specific words, as well as all links the page contains. All of this information is then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.

Website owners recognized the value of a high ranking and visibility in search engine results,[6] creating an opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[7]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[8][dubiousdiscuss] Web content providers also manipulated some attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[9] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank well in their search engine and that some webmasters were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[10]

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[11] Since the success and popularity of a search engine are determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results to any given search, poor quality or irrelevant search results could lead users to find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.

Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[12] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[13] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.[14]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[15][16] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[17] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[18]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[19] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[20] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[21] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[22]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[23] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[24] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[25] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[26]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[27] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[28] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[29]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[30] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[31] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[32]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[33] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[34] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[35] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[36] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[37] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[38] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[39] in addition to their URL submission console.[40] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[41] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[42]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[43] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[44] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[45] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[46]

Preventing crawling

[edit]

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[47] In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint not a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[48]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[49] Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[50] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[49]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[51] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[52]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[15][16][53] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[54] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[55] Both companies, however, quickly apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[56]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals. Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[57] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[58][59] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[60] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[61] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[49]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[62] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[63] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[64] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[65] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and Google remains the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[66] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[67] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68] That market share is achieved in a number of countries.

As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google is not the leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in a given market, it is lagging behind a local player. The most notable example markets are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the Czech Republic, where respectively Baidu, Yahoo! Japan, Naver, Yandex and Seznam are market leaders.

Successful search optimization for international markets may require professional translation of web pages, registration of a domain name with a top level domain in the target market, and web hosting that provides a local IP address. Otherwise, the fundamental elements of search optimization are essentially the same, regardless of language.[67]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[69][70]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[71][72]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ "Intro to Search Engine Optimization | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  7. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  8. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 189–211, November 17, 2020, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517, archived from the original on August 14, 2022, retrieved September 20, 2021
  9. ^ Pringle, G., Allison, L., and Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Proc. 7th Int. World Wide Web Conference. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  11. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  12. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  13. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  14. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  15. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  16. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  17. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  18. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  19. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  20. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  21. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  22. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  23. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  24. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  25. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  26. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  27. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  28. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  30. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  31. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  32. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  33. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  34. ^ "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  35. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  36. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  37. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  38. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  39. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  40. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  41. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  42. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  43. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  44. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  45. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  46. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  47. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  49. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  50. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  51. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  54. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  57. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  58. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  59. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  60. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  61. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  62. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  63. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  64. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  65. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  67. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  70. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  71. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  72. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-05-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

Search analytics is the use of search data to investigate particular interactions among Web searchers, the search engine, or the content during searching episodes.[1] The resulting analysis and aggregation of search engine statistics can be used in search engine marketing (SEM) and search engine optimization (SEO). In other words, search analytics helps website owners understand and improve their performance on search engines based on the outcome. For example, identifying highly valuable site visitors[2] or understanding user intent.[3] Search analytics includes search volume trends and analysis, reverse searching (entering websites to see their keywords), keyword monitoring, search result and advertisement history, advertisement spending statistics, website comparisons, affiliate marketing statistics, multivariate ad testing, etc.[4]

Data collection

[edit]

Search analytics data can be collected in several ways. Search engines provide access to their own data with services such as Google Analytics,[5] Google Trends, and Google Insights. Third-party services must collect their data from ISP's, phoning home software, or from scraping search engines. Getting traffic statistics from ISP's and phone homes provides for broader reporting of web traffic in addition to search analytics. Services that perform keyword monitoring only scrape a limited set of search results, depending on their clients' needs. Services providing reverse search, however, must scrape a large set of keywords from the search engines, usually in the millions, to find the keywords that everyone is using.[6]

Since search results, especially advertisements, differ depending on where you are searching from, data collection methods have to account for geographic location. Keyword monitors do this more easily since they typically know what location their client is targeting. However, to get an exhaustive reverse search, several locations need to be scraped for the same keyword.

Accuracy

[edit]

Search analytics accuracy depends on service being used, data collection method, and data freshness. Google releases its own data, but only in an aggregated way and often without assigning absolute values such as number of visitors to its graphs.[7] ISP logs and phone home methods are accurate for the population they sample, so sample size and demographics must be adequate to accurately represent the larger population. Scraping results can be highly accurate, especially when looking at the non-paid, organic search results. Paid results, from Google AdWords for example,[8] are often different for the same search depending on the time, geographic location, and history of searches from a particular computer. This means that scraping advertisers can be hit or miss.

Market conditions

[edit]

Taking a look at Google Insights to gauge the popularity of these services shows that compared to searches for the term AdWords (Google's popular search ad system), use of search analytics services is still very low, around 1-25% as of Oct. 2009.[9] This could point to a large opportunity for the users and makers of search analytics given that services have existed since 2004 with several new services being started since.

Calculations

[edit]
Sessions with Search = The number of sessions that used your site's search function at least once.
Percentage of sessions that used internal search = Sessions with Search / Total Sessions.
Total Unique Searches = The total number of times your site search was used. This excludes multiple searches on the same keyword during the same session.
Results Pageviews / Search = Pageviews of search result pages / Total Unique Searches.
Search Exits = The number of searches made immediately before leaving the site.
Percentage of Search Exits = Search Exits / Total Unique Searches
Search Refinements = The number of times a user searched again immediately after performing a search.
Percentage Search Refinements = The percentage of searches that resulted in a search refinement. Calculated as Search Refinements / Pageviews of search result pages.
Time after Search = The amount of time users spend on your site after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_duration across all searches / (search_transitions + 1)
Search Depth = The number of pages viewed after performing a search. This is calculated as Sum of all search_depth across all searches / (search_transitions + 1) [10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jansen, B. J. 2006. Search log analysis: What is it; what's been done; how to do it. Library and Information Science Research, 28(3), 407-432.
  2. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  3. ^ Rose, D.E., & Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user goals in web search. In S. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, & C. Wills (Eds.). Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW ’04) (pp. 13–19),. New York: ACM
  4. ^ Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P.A.; Hinsch, C. (2016). "Elements of Strategic Social Media Marketing: A Holistic Framework". Journal of Business Research. 70: 118–126. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ "Analytics Tools & Solutions for Your Business - Google Analytics". marketingplatform.google.com. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
  6. ^ Das, Abhishek (2018-06-02). APPLICATION OF DIGITAL MARKETING FOR LIFE SUCCESS IN BUSINESS. BPB Publications. ISBN 978-93-87284-84-5.
  7. ^ "About Google Trends – Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  8. ^ "Install Google Toolbar - Toolbar Help". support.google.com. Retrieved 2022-11-12.
  9. ^ "Google Trends". Retrieved 2012-12-30.
  10. ^ Google Analytics: How Site Search metrics are calculated?

Social media optimization (SMO) is the use of online platforms to generate income or publicity to increase the awareness of a brand, event, product or service. Types of social media involved include RSS feeds, blogging sites, social bookmarking sites, social news websites, video sharing websites such as Youtube and social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and X(Twitter). SMO is similar to search engine optimization (SEO) in that the goal is to drive web traffic, and draw attention to a company or creator. SMO's focal point is on gaining organic links to social media content. In contrast, SEO's core is about reaching the top of the search engine hierarchy.[1] In general, social media optimization refers to optimizing a website and its content to encourage more users to use and share links to the website across social media and networking sites.[2]

SMO is used to strategically create online content ranging from well-written text to eye-catching digital photos or video clips that encourages and entices people to engage with a website. Users share this content, via its weblink, with social media contacts and friends. Common examples of social media engagement are "liking and commenting on posts, retweeting, embedding, sharing, and promoting content".[3] Social media optimization is also an effective way of implementing online reputation management (ORM), meaning that if someone posts bad reviews of a business, an SMO strategy can ensure that the negative feedback is not the first link to come up in a list of search engine results.[4]

In the 2010s, with social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating web traffic. Publishers such as The Economist employ large social media teams to optimize their online posts and maximize traffic,[5] while other major publishers now use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology to generate higher volumes of web traffic.[6]

Relationship with search engine optimization

[edit]
The flow and proliferation of content and link shares via social media lead to greater search engine optimization.

Social media optimization is an increasingly important factor in search engine optimization, which is the process of designing a website in a way so that it has as high a ranking as possible on search engines. Search engines are increasingly utilizing the recommendations of users of social networks such as Reddit, Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Instagram to rank pages in the search engine result pages.[7] The implication is that when a webpage is shared or "liked" by a user on a social network, it counts as a "vote" for that webpage's quality. Thus, search engines can use such votes accordingly to properly ranked websites in search engine results pages. Furthermore, since it is more difficult to tip the scales or influence the search engines in this way, search engines are putting more stock into social search.[7] This, coupled with increasingly personalized search based on interests and location, has significantly increased the importance of a social media presence in search engine optimization. Due to personalized search results, location-based social media presences on websites such as Yelp, Google Places, Foursquare, and Yahoo! Local have become increasingly important. While social media optimization is related to search engine marketing, it differs in several ways. Primarily, SMO focuses on driving web traffic from sources other than search engines, though improved search engine ranking is also a benefit of successful social media optimization. Further, SMO is helpful to target particular geographic regions in order to target and reach potential customers. This helps in lead generation (finding new customers) and contributes to high conversion rates (i.e., converting previously uninterested individuals into people who are interested in a brand or organization).

Relationship with viral marketing

[edit]

Social media optimization is in many ways connected to the technique of viral marketing or "viral seeding" where word of mouth is created through the use of networking in social bookmarking, video and photo sharing websites. An effective SMO campaign can harness the power of viral marketing; for example, 80% of activity on Pinterest is generated through "repinning."[citation needed] Furthermore, by following social trends and utilizing alternative social networks, websites can retain existing followers while also attracting new ones. This allows businesses to build an online following and presence, all linking back to the company's website for increased traffic. For example, with an effective social bookmarking campaign, not only can website traffic be increased, but a site's rankings can also be increased. In a similar way, the engagement with blogs creates a similar result by sharing content through the use of RSS in the blogosphere. Social media optimization is considered an integral part of an online reputation management (ORM) or search engine reputation management (SERM) strategy for organizations or individuals who care about their online presence.[8] SMO is one of six key influencers that affect Social Commerce Construct (SCC). Online activities such as consumers' evaluations and advices on products and services constitute part of what creates a Social Commerce Construct (SCC).[citation needed]

Social media optimization is not limited to marketing and brand building. Increasingly, smart businesses are integrating social media participation as part of their knowledge management strategy (i.e., product/service development, recruiting, employee engagement and turnover, brand building, customer satisfaction and relations, business development and more). Additionally, social media optimization can be implemented to foster a community of the associated site, allowing for a healthy business-to-consumer (B2C) relationship.[9]

Origins and implementation

[edit]

According to technologist Danny Sullivan, the term "social media optimization" was first used and described by marketer Rohit Bhargava[10][11] on his marketing blog in August 2006. In the same post, Bhargava established the five important rules of social media optimization. Bhargava believed that by following his rules, anyone could influence the levels of traffic and engagement on their site, increase popularity, and ensure that it ranks highly in search engine results. An additional 11 SMO rules have since been added to the list by other marketing contributors.

The 16 rules of SMO, according to one source, are as follows:[12]

  1. Increase your linkability
  2. Make tagging and bookmarking easy
  3. Reward inbound links
  4. Help your content to "travel" via sharing
  5. Encourage the mashup, where users are allowed to remix content
  6. Be a user resource, even if it doesn't help you (e.g., provide resources and information for users)
  7. Reward helpful and valuable users
  8. Participate (join the online conversation)
  9. Know how to target your audience
  10. Create new, quality content ("web scraping" of existing online content is ignored by good search engines)
  11. Be "real" in the tone and style of the posts
  12. Don't forget your roots; be humble
  13. Don't be afraid to experiment, innovate, try new things and "stay fresh"
  14. Develop an SMO strategy
  15. Choose your SMO tactics wisely
  16. Make SMO a key part of your marketing process and develop company best practices

Bhargava's initial five rules were more specifically designed to SMO, while the list is now much broader and addresses everything that can be done across different social media platforms. According to author and CEO of TopRank Online Marketing, Lee Odden, a Social Media Strategy is also necessary to ensure optimization. This is a similar concept to Bhargava's list of rules for SMO.

The Social Media Strategy may consider:[13]

  1. Objectives e.g. creating brand awareness and using social media for external communications.
  2. Listening e.g. monitoring conversations relating to customers and business objectives.
  3. Audience e.g. finding out who the customers are, what they do, who they are influenced by, and what they frequently talk about. It is important to work out what customers want in exchange for their online engagement and attention.
  4. Participation and content e.g. establishing a presence and community online and engaging with users by sharing useful and interesting information.
  5. Measurement e.g. keeping a record of likes and comments on posts, and the number of sales to monitor growth and determine which tactics are most useful in optimizing social media.

According to Lon Safko and David K. Brake in The Social Media Bible, it is also important to act like a publisher by maintaining an effective organizational strategy, to have an original concept and unique "edge" that differentiates one's approach from competitors, and to experiment with new ideas if things do not work the first time.[4] If a business is blog-based, an effective method of SMO is using widgets that allow users to share content to their personal social media platforms. This will ultimately reach a wider target audience and drive more traffic to the original post. Blog widgets and plug-ins for post-sharing are most commonly linked to Facebook, LinkedIn and x.com. They occasionally also link to social media platforms such as Tumblr and Pinterest. Many sharing widgets also include user counters which indicate how many times the content has been liked and shared across different social media pages. This can influence whether or not new users will engage with the post, and also gives businesses an idea of what kind of posts are most successful at engaging audiences. By using relevant and trending keywords in titles and throughout blog posts, a business can also increase search engine optimization and the chances of their content of being read and shared by a large audience.[13] The root of effective SMO is the content that is being posted, so professional content creation tools can be very beneficial. These can include editing programs such as Photoshop, GIMP, Final Cut Pro, and Dreamweaver. Many websites also offer customization options such as different layouts to personalize a page and create a point of difference.[4]

Publishing industry

[edit]

With social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organizations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating traffic. A report by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how a 'second wave of disruption' had hit news organizations,[14] with publishers such as The Economist having to employ large social media teams to optimize their posts, and maximize traffic.[5] Within the context of the publishing industry, even professional fields are utilizing SMO. Because doctors want to maximize exposure to their research findings SMO has also found a place in the medical field.[15]

Today, 3.8 billion people globally are using some form of social media.[citation needed] People frequently obtain health-related information from online social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Healthcare professionals and scientists can communicate with other medical-counterparts to discuss research and findings through social media platforms. These platforms provide researchers with data sets and surveillance that help detect patterns and behavior in preventing, informing, and studying global disease; COVID-19. Additionally, researchers utilize SMO to reach and recruit hard-to-reach patients. SMO narrows specified demographics that filter necessary data in a given study.[citation needed]

Social network games

[edit]

Social media gaming is online gaming activity performed through social media sites with friends and online gaming activity that promotes social media interaction. Examples of the former include FarmVille, Clash of Clans, Clash Royale, FrontierVille, and Mafia Wars. In these games a player's social network is exploited to recruit additional players and allies. An example of the latter is Empire Avenue, a virtual stock exchange where players buy and sell shares of each other's social network worth. Nielsen Media Research estimates that, as of June 2010, social networking and playing online games account for about one-third of all online activity by Americans.[16]

Facebook

[edit]

Facebook has in recent years become a popular channel for advertising, alongside traditional forms such as television, radio, and print. With over 1 billion active users, and 50% of those users logging into their accounts every day[17] it is an important communication platform that businesses can utilize and optimize to promote their brand and drive traffic to their websites. There are three commonly used strategies to increase advertising reach on Facebook:

  1. Improving the effectiveness of posts, achieved by adjusting the length and timing of posts to influence the number of likes and comments it receives. This will help the post reach a greater number of Facebook users, ultimately increasing its reach.
  2. Increasing network size, achieved by analyzing user behavior to determine how often to post and what type of content to post.
  3. Buying more reach, achieved by paying Facebook to advertise a post.

Improving effectiveness and increasing network size are organic approaches, while buying more reach is a paid approach which does not require any further action.[18] Most businesses will attempt an "organic" approach to gaining a significant following before considering a paid approach. Because Facebook requires a login, it is important that posts are public to ensure they will reach the widest possible audience. Posts that have been heavily shared and interacted with by users are displayed as 'highlighted posts' at the top of newsfeeds. In order to achieve this status, the posts need to be engaging, interesting, or useful. This can be achieved by being spontaneous, asking questions, addressing current events and issues, and optimizing trending hashtags and keywords. The more engagement a post receives, the further it will spread and the more likely it is to feature on first in search results.

Due to its popularity and widespread use, Facebook is a useful channel for social media optimization.

Another organic approach to Facebook optimization is cross-linking different social platforms. By posting links to websites or social media sites in the profile 'about' section, it is possible to direct traffic and ultimately increase search engine optimization. Another option is to share links to relevant videos and blog posts.[13] Facebook Connect is a functionality that launched in 2008 to allow Facebook users to sign up to different websites, enter competitions, and access exclusive promotions by logging in with their existing Facebook account details. This is beneficial to users as they don't have to create a new login every time they want to sign up to a website, but also beneficial to businesses as Facebook users become more likely to share their content. Often the two are interlinked, where in order to access parts of a website, a user has to like or share certain things on their personal profile or invite a number of friends to like a page. This can lead to greater traffic flow to a website as it reaches a wider audience. Businesses have more opportunities to reach their target markets if they choose a paid approach to SMO. When Facebook users create an account, they are urged to fill out their personal details such as gender, age, location, education, current and previous employers, religious and political views, interests, and personal preferences such as movie and music tastes. Facebook then takes this information and allows advertisers to use it to determine how to best market themselves to users that they know will be interested in their product. This can also be known as micro-targeting. If a user clicks on a link to like a page, it will show up on their profile and newsfeed. This then feeds back into organic social media optimization, as friends of the user will see this and be encouraged to click on the page themselves. Although advertisers are buying mass reach, they are attracting a customer base with a genuine interest in their product. Once a customer base has been established through a paid approach, businesses will often run promotions and competitions to attract more organic followers.[12]

The number of businesses that use Facebook to advertise also holds significant relevance. in 2017, there were three million businesses that advertised on Facebook.[19] This makes Facebook the world's largest platform for social media advertising. What also holds importance is the amount of money leading businesses are spending on Facebook advertising alone. Procter & Gamble spend $60 million every year on Facebook advertising.[20] Other advertisers on Facebook include Microsoft, with a yearly spend of £35 million, Amazon, Nestle and American Express all with yearly expenditures above £25 million per year.

Furthermore, the number of small businesses advertising on Facebook is of relevance. This number has grown rapidly over the upcoming years and demonstrates how important social media advertising actually is. Currently 70% of the UK's small businesses use Facebook advertising.[21] This is a substantial number of advertisers. Almost half of the world's small businesses use social media marketing product of some sort. This demonstrates the impact that social media has had on the current digital marketing era.

Engagement Rate

[edit]

ER (Engagement Rate) represents the activity of users specific for a certain profile on Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok or any other Social Media. A common way to calculate it is the following:

In the above formula followers is the total number of followers (friends, subscribers, etc), interactions stands for the number of interactions, such as likes, comments, personal messages, shares. The latter is averaged over the certain period of time, which should normally be short enough to ensure the variance in followers number is negligible during this period.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Tuten, Tracy; Solomon, Michael (2018). Social Media Marketing (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 229–230. ISBN 9781526423863.
  2. ^ Sturgis, Ingrid (2014). "Social Media Optimization". In Harvey, Kerric (ed.). Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics. Vol. 3. CQ Press. pp. 1167–1171.
  3. ^ Bradley, S. V. (2015). Win the game of Google-opoly: Unlocking the secret strategy of search engines. Wiley. ISBN 9781119002581.
  4. ^ a b c Frick, T (2010). Return on engagement: Content, strategy and design techniques for digital marketing. Oxford: Focal. ISBN 9781136030253.
  5. ^ a b Preston, Peter (July 31, 2016). "Print still has a future, and Le Monde can prove it. Aux armes, citoyens!". The Guardian.
  6. ^ Smith, Mark (July 22, 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". BBC News.
  7. ^ a b Enge, Eric (November 30, 2010). "Search Engine Optimization in an Increasingly Social World". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved July 17, 2012.
  8. ^ Cody, Steve (April 18, 2014). "7 Reasons You Need to Manage Your Online Presence More Carefully". Inc.com. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  9. ^ Chaturvedi, Madhur (April 22, 2013). "Effective Social Media Strategies – Four Tips, Four Benefits". Oracle.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
  10. ^ Sullivan, Danny (August 29, 2006). "Social Media Optimization: It's Like SEO, For Social Sites". blog.searchenginewatch.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2007. Retrieved September 6, 2007.
  11. ^ Olthuis, Cameron (August 15, 2006). "Introduction to Social Media Optimization". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved March 8, 2013.
  12. ^ a b Burcher, N (2012). Paid, owned, earned: Maximising marketing returns in a socially connected world. London: Kogan Page. pp. 104–105. ISBN 9780749465636.
  13. ^ a b c Odden, L (2012). Optimize: How to attract and engage more customers by integrating SEO, social media, and content marketing. NJ: Wiley. ISBN 9781118167779. Social media optimization.
  14. ^ Wakefield, Jane (June 15, 2016). "Social media 'outstrips TV' as news source for young people". BBC News.
  15. ^ Chi, Gerald; Cushman, Mary (April 2019). "Social media optimization in medicine: A journal's perspective: Editorial". Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 3 (2): 144–146. doi:10.1002/rth2.12199. PMC 6462736. PMID 31011694.
  16. ^ "What Americans Do Online: Social Media And Games Dominate Activity". Nielsen Wire. Retrieved March 22, 2011.
  17. ^ Safko, L (2009). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. ^ Ballings, Michel; Van den Poel, Dirk; Bogaert, Matthias (March 1, 2016). "Social media optimization: Identifying an optimal strategy for increasing network size on Facebook". Omega. Business Analytics. 59, Part A: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.017.
  19. ^ "3 Million Advertisers on Facebook". Facebook for Business. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  20. ^ "These Are The 35 Biggest Advertisers On Facebook". Business Insider. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  21. ^ "Almost Half of Small Businesses Marketing Products on Social Media (INFOGRAPHIC)". smallbiztrends.com. October 7, 2016. Retrieved May 12, 2017.